Empresa
¿Quiénes somos? Visión y Valores
Herramientas
Email Checker Vigía DNS SSL Checker Password Strength HTTP Headers
Alertas
Todas las alertas Vulnerabilidades Incidentes Solo críticas En CISA KEV
Editorial
Análisis técnico ¿Cuál es mi IP?
Blog
Blog 2MCI ISO 27001 Amenazas LATAM Recursos Gratuitos eBook Gratuito Newsletter Podcast / YouTube
Empresa
Servicios Contacto Suscribirse al Newsletter
🆕 Nuevo en 2MCI
✨ Crear cuenta gratis 🛠️ Ver herramientas sin registro
Ya tengo cuenta
🔒 Iniciar sesión
Equipo
🏠 Portal interno 2MCI
Crítico CVE-2026-40047 Apache

[CVE-2026-40047] Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection') vulnerability in …

Vulnerabilidad · Publicado 06/07/2026 · Actualizado 01/08/2026

9.1
CVSS 3.x
04 Medio7 Alto9 Crítico10
Severidad: Crítico
Resumen ejecutivo

Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection') vulnerability in Apache Camel Docling component.

The camel-docling component invokes the external `docling` command-line tool by assembling an argument list in DoclingProducer and executing it through java.lang.ProcessBuilder. Custom CLI arguments supplied through the `CamelDoclingCustomArguments` exchange header (…

Descripción técnica

Descripción técnica

Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection') vulnerability in Apache Camel Docling component. The camel-docling component invokes the external `docling` command-line tool by assembling an argument list in DoclingProducer and executing it through java.lang.ProcessBuilder. Custom CLI arguments supplied through the `CamelDoclingCustomArguments` exchange header (a List<String>) were appended to that argument list with insufficient validation: the original implementation relied on a denylist of disallowed flags and only rejected path values that contained a literal `../` sequence. As a result, a Camel route that forwards externally-influenced data into the `CamelDoclingCustomArguments` header (or into the path-bearing headers used to build the invocation) could cause the producer to pass unrecognized or unintended `docling` CLI flags to the subprocess, and could supply path-like argument values that resolved outside the intended directory through traversal sequences not caught by the literal `../` check. Because Camel itself builds the `docling` invocation from these values, the component is responsible for constraining them, and the weak validation allowed CLI-argument injection and directory traversal in the arguments passed to the external tool. The invocation uses the list-based form of ProcessBuilder, so a shell does not interpret the argument values; OS command injection through shell metacharacters was not possible, and the metacharacter rejection added by the fix is defense-in-depth. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to a release that contains the CAMEL-23212 fix. On the mainline the fix is included from Apache Camel 4.19.0 (and later releases such as 4.20.0). For users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream, upgrade to 4.18.3. The fix replaces the denylist with a strict allowlist of recognized `docling` CLI flags (rejecting any unrecognized flag, and rejecting producer-managed flags such as the output-directory flags), defensively rejects shell metacharacters in argument values, and normalizes path-like values with Path.normalize() before validating them so that traversal sequences which bypass a literal `../` check are detected. As defence in depth, route authors should avoid mapping untrusted message content into the `CamelDoclingCustomArguments` header and the path-bearing headers, and should strip Camel-internal headers from messages that arrive from untrusted producers.

Puntuación CVSS

Score: 9.1/10 — Severidad: CRITICAL — Estado NIST: Analyzed

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Productos afectados

Camel — Apache

Debilidades (CWE)

CWE-88

Fuente oficial

Publicado en NIST NVD.

¿Qué hacer?
  • Revisar el aviso oficial del fabricante y aplicar los parches o mitigaciones disponibles
  • Consultar las referencias en NIST NVD para actualizaciones de estado
  • Priorizar según el score CVSS y la exposición de los sistemas afectados
Esta alerta fue generada automáticamente a partir del NVD del NIST.
← Volver a todas las alertas