Empresa
¿Quiénes somos? Visión y Valores
Herramientas
Email Checker Vigía DNS SSL Checker Password Strength HTTP Headers
Alertas
Todas las alertas Vulnerabilidades Incidentes Solo críticas En CISA KEV
Editorial
Análisis técnico ¿Cuál es mi IP?
Blog
Blog 2MCI ISO 27001 Amenazas LATAM Recursos Gratuitos eBook Gratuito Newsletter Podcast / YouTube
Empresa
Servicios Contacto Suscribirse al Newsletter
🆕 Nuevo en 2MCI
✨ Crear cuenta gratis 🛠️ Ver herramientas sin registro
Ya tengo cuenta
🔒 Iniciar sesión
Equipo
🏠 Portal interno 2MCI
Alto CVE-2026-52946 Linux

[CVE-2026-52946] In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lo…

Vulnerabilidad · Publicado 24/06/2026 · Actualizado 01/08/2026

7.5
CVSS 3.x
04 Medio7 Alto9 Crítico10
Severidad: Alto
Resumen ejecutivo

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling

A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in
send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal.

When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both
functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list…

Descripción técnica

Descripción técnica

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal. When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list. However, they are frequently called from softirq context: - send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync - send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ) The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism: 1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait(). 2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in fork() or exit() and spins, which blocks all new readers. 3. CPU 0 is interrupted by a softirq (e.g., TCP URG packet reception). 4. The softirq calls send_sigurg() and attempts to acquire read_lock(&tasklist_lock), deadlocking because CPU 1 is waiting. Since PID hashing and do_each_pid_task() traversals are already RCU-protected, the read_lock on tasklist_lock is no longer strictly required for safe traversal. Fix this by replacing tasklist_lock with rcu_read_lock(), aligning the process group signaling path with the single-PID path. This also mitigates a potential remote denial of service vector via TCP URG packets. Lockdep splat: ===================================================== WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected [...] Chain exists of: &dev->event_lock --> &f_owner->lock --> tasklist_lock Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(tasklist_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&dev->event_lock); lock(&f_owner->lock); <Interrupt> lock(&dev->event_lock); *** DEADLOCK ***

Puntuación CVSS

Score: 7.5/10 — Severidad: HIGH — Estado NIST: Analyzed

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Productos afectados

Linux kernel — Linux

Debilidades (CWE)

CWE-667

Fuente oficial

Publicado en NIST NVD.

¿Qué hacer?
  • Revisar el aviso oficial del fabricante y aplicar los parches o mitigaciones disponibles
  • Consultar las referencias en NIST NVD para actualizaciones de estado
  • Priorizar según el score CVSS y la exposición de los sistemas afectados
Esta alerta fue generada automáticamente a partir del NVD del NIST.
← Volver a todas las alertas