Empresa
¿Quiénes somos? Visión y Valores
Herramientas
Email Checker Vigía DNS SSL Checker Password Strength HTTP Headers
Alertas
Todas las alertas Vulnerabilidades Incidentes Solo críticas En CISA KEV
Editorial
Análisis técnico ¿Cuál es mi IP?
Blog
Blog 2MCI ISO 27001 Amenazas LATAM Recursos Gratuitos eBook Gratuito Newsletter Podcast / YouTube
Empresa
Servicios Contacto Suscribirse al Newsletter
🆕 Nuevo en 2MCI
✨ Crear cuenta gratis 🛠️ Ver herramientas sin registro
Ya tengo cuenta
🔒 Iniciar sesión
Equipo
🏠 Portal interno 2MCI
Crítico CVE-2026-53913 Apache

[CVE-2026-53913] Improper Authentication, Missing Authentication for Critical Function, Not Failing Securely ('Failin…

Vulnerabilidad · Publicado 06/07/2026 · Actualizado 01/08/2026

9.8
CVSS 3.x
04 Medio7 Alto9 Crítico10
Severidad: Crítico
Resumen ejecutivo

Improper Authentication, Missing Authentication for Critical Function, Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open') vulnerability in Apache Camel Keycloak Component.

The KeycloakSecurityPolicy of camel-keycloak guards a route by running KeycloakSecurityProcessor.beforeProcess(), which performs three checks in sequence: it rejects a request that carries no access token, then - only if requiredRoles is no…

Descripción técnica

Descripción técnica

Improper Authentication, Missing Authentication for Critical Function, Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open') vulnerability in Apache Camel Keycloak Component. The KeycloakSecurityPolicy of camel-keycloak guards a route by running KeycloakSecurityProcessor.beforeProcess(), which performs three checks in sequence: it rejects a request that carries no access token, then - only if requiredRoles is non-empty - validates the roles, and - only if requiredPermissions is non-empty - validates the permissions. The actual cryptographic verification of the bearer access token (signature, issuer and expiry for a local JWT, or active-state and issuer for token introspection) is performed exclusively inside those role and permission checks. KeycloakSecurityPolicy defaults requiredRoles and requiredPermissions to empty - which is the documented 'Basic Setup' - so on a route configured that way the role and permission checks are skipped and the access token is therefore never verified. The token-presence check still rejects a missing token, but an invalid token is accepted: any non-null value in the Authorization: Bearer header - including an arbitrary string or a forged, unsigned JWT - passes the policy and the request reaches the protected route, with no signature, issuer or expiry check and no request to Keycloak. The token is read from the inbound request header because allowTokenFromHeader defaults to true. Because the normal reason to place a route behind this policy is that the route performs server-side work, the bypass results in unauthenticated access to that work; where the protected route forwards to a code-execution-capable producer, it can result in unauthenticated remote code execution. This defect is independent of CVE-2026-23552: that issue concerned the issuer claim and was fixed by adding a check inside the verification routine, but here the verification routine is not reached at all in the default configuration, so the defect remains. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, configure a non-empty requiredRoles or requiredPermissions on every KeycloakSecurityPolicy so that the token-verification path is exercised, set allowTokenFromHeader to false where the token is not expected from the request header, or perform token verification at the framework layer ahead of the policy.

Puntuación CVSS

Score: 9.8/10 — Severidad: CRITICAL — Estado NIST: Analyzed

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Productos afectados

Camel — Apache

Debilidades (CWE)

CWE-287, CWE-306, CWE-636

Fuente oficial

Publicado en NIST NVD.

¿Qué hacer?
  • Revisar el aviso oficial del fabricante y aplicar los parches o mitigaciones disponibles
  • Consultar las referencias en NIST NVD para actualizaciones de estado
  • Priorizar según el score CVSS y la exposición de los sistemas afectados
Esta alerta fue generada automáticamente a partir del NVD del NIST.
← Volver a todas las alertas