Empresa
¿Quiénes somos? Visión y Valores
Herramientas
Email Checker Vigía DNS SSL Checker Password Strength HTTP Headers
Alertas
Todas las alertas Vulnerabilidades Incidentes Solo críticas En CISA KEV
Editorial
Análisis técnico ¿Cuál es mi IP?
Blog
Blog 2MCI ISO 27001 Amenazas LATAM Recursos Gratuitos eBook Gratuito Newsletter Podcast / YouTube
Empresa
Servicios Contacto Suscribirse al Newsletter
Nuevo en 2MCI
Crear cuenta gratis Ver herramientas sin registro
Ya tengo cuenta
Iniciar sesión
Equipo
Portal interno 2MCI
Alto CVE-2026-98070 Multiple Vendors

[CVE-2026-98070] In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/rds: acquire RDS_IN_XMIT in…

Vulnerabilidad · Publicado 25/09/2026

8.1
CVSS 3.x
04 Medio7 Alto9 Crítico10
Severidad: Alto
Resumen ejecutivo

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/rds: acquire RDS_IN_XMIT in rds_tcp_reset_callbacks()

rds_tcp_reset_callbacks() quiesces the transmit path by setting the
path state to RDS_CONN_RESETTING and then waiting for RDS_IN_XMIT to
be sampled clear before swapping the underlying socket and calling
rds_send_path_reset().

Sampling the bit clear is not the same as ow…

Descripción técnica

Descripción técnica

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/rds: acquire RDS_IN_XMIT in rds_tcp_reset_callbacks() rds_tcp_reset_callbacks() quiesces the transmit path by setting the path state to RDS_CONN_RESETTING and then waiting for RDS_IN_XMIT to be sampled clear before swapping the underlying socket and calling rds_send_path_reset(). Sampling the bit clear is not the same as owning it: rds_send_xmit() can re-acquire RDS_IN_XMIT right after the wait_event() returns. Its state recheck after taking the lock is a store-buffering pattern (the resetter writes the state and reads the bit, the sender writes the bit and reads the state) and acquire_in_xmit() is only an acquire operation, so on weakly ordered architectures both sides can miss each other's write and the transmit path then runs concurrently with rds_send_path_reset() rewriting cp_xmit_* state - which is exactly what the comment above rds_send_path_reset() tells its callers to prevent. Take the lock instead, hold it across the socket swap and rds_send_path_reset(), and release it with a wake-up at the end. The lock-ordering constraint documented above the wait still holds: the lock is acquired before lock_sock(), so a sender inside tcp_sendmsg() can never be waited on while we hold the socket lock. Two details of the old code go away with the same change: - t_sock is now read only after the lock is acquired. The old code cached it before waiting; the teardown in rds_conn_shutdown() releases that socket and clears t_sock, so a pointer cached before the wait can be stale by the time the accept path resumes. Reading it under RDS_IN_XMIT is what makes the exclusion complete once the teardown owns the same lock, which the next patch arranges; until then the teardown still only samples the bit, and the two paths remain as exposed to each other as they are today. - The old !osock early path called rds_send_path_reset() with no serialization at all. It now runs under the lock like the normal path. The conditional RDS_CONN_RESETTING transition of the previous patch happens before the socket check either way: a path found without a socket is either still connecting (its reconnect worker blocked on t_conn_path_lock) and legitimately goes RESETTING -> UP on the new socket, or it has been torn down meanwhile and is dropped. The in-function comment describing the old wait-based quiesce is rewritten to describe the lock-based one, and the stale block comment above the function (which still described a return value and an incomplete list of t_sock writers) is refreshed to name all four writers - the connect, accept, teardown and swap paths - and what serializes each of them.

Puntuación CVSS

Score: 8.1/10 — Severidad: HIGH — Estado NIST: Received

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Fuente oficial

Publicado en NIST NVD.

¿Qué hacer?
  • Revisar el aviso oficial del fabricante y aplicar los parches o mitigaciones disponibles
  • Consultar las referencias en NIST NVD para actualizaciones de estado
  • Priorizar según el score CVSS y la exposición de los sistemas afectados
Esta alerta fue generada automáticamente a partir del NVD del NIST.